Violation of Rule 13...

To give an example of what not to do, let's look to my latest eHarm date who's name will be "Guy who can't tell me what he does because he thinks that sounds cool" or "GWCTMWHDBHTTSC". Take your pick. Oh he's also the one who sneak attack kissed me in a parking garage while mouth breathing...

Anyways, so looking back through my last couple of posts and specifically rule thirteen, I must tell you about GWCTMWHDBHTTSC.So GWCTMWHDBHTTSC is the reason for all of my new rule additions (three of them) and the best slash most heart breaking one is rule thirteen...

So Tuesday we had the horribly awkward and tragic text message conversation about how he could tell after hanging out with his buddies I was over it. I wanted to text back "how could you tell GWCTMWHDBHTTSC? was it when I lipped off to your friend making fun of me for going to grad school? Or the time I just was silent staring at the screen when one made some comment about females like sports? Or was it when the second they bailed I wouldn't stay over like you'd hoped when you said 'my roommate is gone for the weekend...' like you thought I was THAT kind of girl?" but since I only get 160 characters on text messages, I refrained, kept it nice and professional and just told him that the chemistry wasn't there and I didn't want to lead him on.

Phew made it through that one and thought it was over with GWCTMWHDBHTTSC. Wrong.

Saturday I get this text from him (yes it's word for word): "Hey Noelle would you want to hangout sometime just as friends, maybe see a padres game or perhaps bowling or something? I don't have a lot of friends, in fact you met most of them last week lol"

Awful. Just awful. Well maybe a side of tragic is in there too. I ignored the text until today when a co-worker was like "Well I'd at least like a response even if it was a 'no'" So thanks to Chip, GWCTMWHDBHTTSC get a response. Probably not the one he was hoping for.

Question to my readers... should I have responded or just let it be?